[coc-incident-resolution-ombuds] Impartiality and Due Process
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 84
- Forks
- 69
- Avg merge
- 14h 52m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Referencing https://github.com/w3c/guide/blob/main/process/coc-incident-resolution-ombuds.md ...
Among the expectations for those involved in addressing incidents should be impartiality and due process:
- The chair, ombuds, Team member, or other person attempting resolution should not assume or act with bias towards anyone involved in the dispute.
- The resolver should investigate both sides of a dispute and the context in which it occurs.
- The investigation should give an opportunity to each person involved in the incident to explain their side of the story and correct the record, prior to making any judgements about the situation.
- Any disciplinary measures should be appropriate to addressing the problem, and proportional to its impact.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read coc-incident-resolution-ombuds.md and compare its current expectations with the four impartiality and due-process points in this issue. Check the surrounding incident-resolution guidance before deciding how the principles fit and what wording is consistent. Done means the guidance addresses impartiality, investigation of both sides, an opportunity to respond, and proportional disciplinary measures.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100