[css-ruby-1] "zh-Hanb" or "zh-Hant", which is correct for 30% font-size rule?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
css-ruby-1
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 816
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby/#default-ua-ruby
rtc:lang(zh-TW), :not(rtc) > rt:lang(zh-TW),
rtc:lang(zh-Hanb), :not(rtc) > rt:lang(zh-Hanb), {
font-size: 30%; } /* bopomofo */
I think the "zh-Hanb" means Chenese with bopomofo script, but I found the following descriptin in the "Changes since the 2 December 2021 WD":
- Added
zh-Hantto rule applying font-size: 30% to ruby annotations in HTML.
"zh-Hanb" or "zh-Hant", which is correct?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the CSS Ruby default UA ruby section and compare its zh-TW and zh-Hanb selectors with the cited “Changes since the 2 December 2021 WD” note. Check the relevant language-tag definitions and determine which tag is intended; done means the specification and change note consistently use the correct term.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- css
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100