[css-typed-om-1] Should css typed om support the same simplifications as css-values-4?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
css-typed-om
Needs Edits
Needs Testcase (WPT)
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 816
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
So, the question is should https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-typed-om-1/ support the same simplifications (like distributing multiplication over sum and sorting the dimensions alphabetically) as css-values-4? Like https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification and https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#sort-a-calculations-children?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the CSS Typed OM Level 1 draft with the linked CSS Values 4 sections on calc simplification and sorting calculation children. The issue does not identify a repository file or test; work is complete only after the specification question is resolved and the relevant draft text reflects the decision.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- css
- Domain
- documentation, web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100