[css-images] Should `object-position` affect `<iframe>`?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
css-images-3
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 816
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
<!DOCTYPE html>
<iframe src="http://example.com" style="object-position: 100px 100px"></iframe>
| Firefox & Servo | Blink & WebKit |
|---|---|
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images/#propdef-object-position says
Applies to: replaced elements
and an <iframe> is replaced, right?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the CSS Images specification section linked in the issue and the supplied iframe example. Compare the reported Firefox/Servo and Blink/WebKit behavior, then determine whether object-position is intended to apply to iframes; done requires a resolved standards position and any corresponding specification update.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- css, html
- Domain
- frontend, web-dev
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100