w3c / w3c/css-validator

Custom protocol reported as invalid

Open
#466 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Java
Stars
250
Forks
123
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Originally reported to HTML validator https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/1949.

Steps to reproduce:

  • Validate this code:
    .foo { background: url("foo://example.com/image.svg"); }

Result:
Validation failed (Value Error : background url("foo://example.com/image.svg") is an incorrect URL url("foo://example.com/image.svg")

Expected:
Validation passed.

I did not find in HTML/CSS specification any rule which suggests that I can't use custom protocol.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the validation failure with the CSS snippet in this issue and trace how the validator checks the custom foo:// URL in the background declaration. Done means the snippet validates successfully without weakening validation for genuinely invalid URLs.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
50/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.