Qualified and unqualified link relationships
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 313
- Forks
- 70
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Section 4.2 says:
Formally, the former example establishes an unqualified direct relationship with the image resource while the latter creates a qualified, indirect relationship that allows additional properties about the relationship to be specified.
What do "qualified" and "direct" mean here? What is the formal framework for this distinction? Why is there a link to this book?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with Section 4.2 and the linked qualified-relation book page. Determine how the specification uses “qualified,” “unqualified,” “direct,” and “indirect,” and why the external reference is included. Update the section so these terms and the formal distinction are explained, and confirm that each question in the issue is answered.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100