w3c / w3c/ServiceWorker

consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration

Open
#756 107 comments 4 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

apr-2017-f2f-v1 TPAC2025
Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
3.6k
Forks
324
Avg merge
14d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Currently gecko has a bug where multiple service worker threads can be spun up for the same registration. This can happen when windows in separate child processes open documents controlled by the same registration. Per the spec, the FetchEvents should be dispatched to the same worker instance. In practice, we spin up different work threads for each child process and dispatch there.

While discussing how to fix this, we started to wonder if its really a problem. Service workers already discourage shared global state since the thread can be killed at any time. If the service worker script is solely using Cache, IDB, etc to store state, then running multiple thread instances is not a problem.

It seems the main issue where this could cause problems is for code that wants to use global variables while holding the worker alive using waitUntil() or respondWith(). This is theoretically observable by script, but seems to have limited useful applications.

How would people feel about loosening the current spec to allow a browser to spin up more than one worker thread for a single registration? When to execute multiple threads and how many would be up to the browser implementation.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Read the issue discussion and the current Service Worker specification text governing worker instances and FetchEvents. Determine whether the proposed change has consensus and identify the affected normative sections; done means an agreed specification change with updated wording.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.