w3c / w3c/ServiceWorker

Support `close()` method in ServiceWorkerGlobalScope

Open
#1,696 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
3.6k
Forks
324
Avg merge
14d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

close() is supported in the DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope (source), but not the ServiceWorkerGlobalScope.

In Manifest V3, the latest version of the Web Extensions platform, extensions can use service workers as a background context. In the Web Extensions Community Group, we have been discussing a feature request to support the immediate termination of a service worker.

We would prefer a spec level solution over an extension specific API so filing this issue.

There are a few key use cases we have identified:

  • A developer is handling sensitive data in the service worker (e.g a password manager). When the user asks the password manager to lock, immediately terminating the service worker would provide some additional certainty that any data in memory can be freed (source).
  • A developer is writing tests and wants to immediately terminate the service worker (source).
  • In general, a service worker no longer has any work to perform and wishes to free up resources.

I found https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/865 which has some of the history: it appears this initially threw an error, and was then moved to avoid exposing it entirely. But I couldn't find any specific motivations for not supporting it.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the ServiceWorkerGlobalScope specification and review the linked history in w3c/ServiceWorker#865 and Web Extensions #311. The issue requires deciding whether and how close() should be specified; done would require a resolved spec change and agreement on its termination semantics.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
api, web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.