consider how clients.claim() should work with srcdoc iframes
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
apr-2017-f2f-v1
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 3.6k
- Forks
- 324
- Avg merge
- 14d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Currently the spec says that srcdoc iframes should inherit their parent's controlling service worker. When a window client is controlled via clients.claim(), should we also claim any immediate child srcdoc iframes?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the Service Worker specification's rules for clients.claim(), window clients, and srcdoc iframes. Determine whether claiming a window client should include its immediate child srcdoc iframes, and document the resolved behavior in the specification.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100