voidzero-dev / voidzero-dev/vite-plus

vp lint / vp run lint print no summary on a clean pass (unlike vp exec turbo run lint)

Open
#2,035 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
5.8k
Forks
261
Avg merge
1d 34m
Merged PRs (30d)
135

Description

## Summary

Running `vp lint ` (or `vp run lint`, the task-runner form) directly prints **nothing at all** and exits 0 when there are zero lint violations — no "Found 0 warnings and 0 errors" summary, no file/rule count, nothing. The same underlying lint task, when invoked via `vp exec turbo run lint --filter=`, prints the full oxlint summary line even on a clean pass:

```
manolea-placeholder:lint: $ vp lint .
manolea-placeholder:lint: Found 0 warnings and 0 errors.
manolea-placeholder:lint: Finished in 422ms on 1103 files with 95 rules using 16 threads.
```

To be clear, this is **not** a correctness bug — I verified with injected violations that both invocation paths correctly detect and report real problems (a syntax error fails with exit 1 and the parse error text; a `debugger;` statement prints the `eslint(no-debugger)` warning by name in both paths). The only difference is the empty-output case.

## Why this is worth fixing

Empty stdout + exit 0 is ambiguous to a human running `vp lint .` locally before pushing: "no output" could mean "ran cleanly" or "didn't actually run" (e.g. wrong cwd, misconfigured filter, crashed silently). The turbo-wrapped invocation resolves that ambiguity by always printing a summary; the direct `vp lint`/`vp run lint` invocation doesn't.

## Repro

In a workspace with a shared `vite.config.ts` (via `defineConfig()`, exporting `lint`/`run`/etc. sub-configs) and a package whose `package.json` has `"lint": "vp lint ."`:

```sh
# From the package directory — prints nothing, exit 0
cd packages/some-pkg
vp lint .
echo $? # 0

# From the workspace root — prints a summary even though nothing changed
vp exec turbo run lint --filter=some-pkg --force
```

## Ask

Have `vp lint`/`vp run lint` print the same "Found N warnings and M errors. Finished in Xms on Y files with Z rules" summary on a clean pass that `vp exec turbo run lint` shows, so a passing run is visibly distinguishable from a run that silently did nothing.

## Environment

- vite-plus 0.2.1
- oxlint 1.70.0
- Linux x86_64

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Reproduce the direct `vp lint .` and `vp exec turbo run lint --filter=some-pkg --force` commands from the issue and compare their clean-pass output. Trace the `vp lint`/`vp run lint` path and its handling of the underlying oxlint result; done means a clean direct run prints the warning/error, timing, file, and rule summary while preserving the reported exit status.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript, rust, typescript
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.