S3 for files instead of local storage.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- V
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 79
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We should add an ability to use s3 for file storage rather than local storage if the user wants. This will allow both horizontal scaling as well as hosting on small servers like fly.io.
Since already RAM requirements are very less.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name files, tests, or an entry point. First locate how Gitly currently stores files locally, then determine the configuration and storage behavior needed for S3; done means users can choose S3 instead of local storage and the result supports horizontal scaling and small servers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- aws
- Domain
- backend, cloud
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100