vim-jp / vim-jp/vimdoc-ja-working
options.txt 中の既定値部分で表記ゆれがある
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Vim Script
- Stars
- 84
- Forks
- 61
- Avg merge
- 2d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 35
Description
次のような表記ゆれが見られます。
- 既定では "" (
:help 'pastetoggle'@ja) - 既定では空 (
:help 'breakindentopt'@ja) - 既定では: "" (
:help 'concealcursor'@ja) - 既定では"" (
:help 'tabline'@ja) - 既定は空 (
:help 'printencoding'@ja) - 既定では: 空 (
:help 'omnifunc'@ja)
調べてみて分かったことがあり、ほとんどが原文に忠実な翻訳になっていました。
また、"" と empty の違いは単項か多項(カンマ区切りなど)になっていると言うことも分かりました。
- default "" (
:help 'pastetoggle'@en) - default empty (
:help 'breakindentopt'@en) - default: "" (
:help 'concealcursor'@en) - default empty (
:help 'tabline'@en) - default empty (
:help 'printencoding'@en) - default: empty (
:help 'omnifunc'@en)
このような表記ゆれを防ぎ、必要であれば原文を直すことを検討したいと思いました。
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with options.txt and compare the Japanese entries for pastetoggle, breakindentopt, concealcursor, tabline, printencoding, and omnifunc with their English help tags. Determine whether each variation follows the source wording, then make the relevant documentation wording consistent and update the source where needed; done means the affected default-value descriptions follow an agreed convention.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- vim
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100