Repository Should Be Archived
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 44.7k
- Forks
- 3.6k
- Avg merge
- 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Clearly, we will not be seeing any new updates. As interesting as this project was, unless a new maintainer takes the helm, this project should be archived.
Allowing users to create new issues and PRs that will never be fixed may lead to confusion. I can imagine a number of hyper users/contributors would be willing to take over the project. Over 10 months since a dependabot commit and over two years since an actual release is clear enough.
This was such an interesting project and may be able to see a new light with all of the changes we've seen around the JS ecosystem in recent times. After 9 years, I've switched off of hyper and it's saddening to see. To prevent anyone writing up detailed issues or wasting time on working through PRs, I think it would be responsible to archive hyper in its current state until a new maintainer is willing to come along.
cc: @rauchg @LabhanshAgrawal
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The requested change concerns the GitHub repository settings rather than a source file. Review the hyper repository's current maintenance status and archive controls; done means the repository is archived to prevent new issues and pull requests from being opened.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- release
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100