perf(sort): Benchmark with a random 95MB file slow
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
U - sort
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 24.1k
- Forks
- 2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 365
Description
Hi, uutils mainteners
i confirmed that the uu sort extremly a slow with 95MB file, as we did in the benchmark
relunsec@relunsec:~/software/coreutils/target/release$ cat /dev/urandom > random_data
^C
relunsec@relunsec:~/software/coreutils/target/release$ ls -lh random_data
-rw-rw-r-- 1 relunsec relunsec 95M Jun 29 08:37 random_data
relunsec@relunsec:~/software/coreutils/target/release$ hyperfine --shell=none --warmup 3 "./sort random_data" "gnusort random_data"
Benchmark 1: ./sort random_data
Time (mean ± σ): 5.487 s ± 0.040 s [User: 6.048 s, System: 0.211 s]
Range (min … max): 5.447 s … 5.566 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: gnusort random_data
Time (mean ± σ): 1.620 s ± 0.030 s [User: 4.360 s, System: 0.138 s]
Range (min … max): 1.581 s … 1.676 s 10 runs
Summary
gnusort random_data ran
3.39 ± 0.07 times faster than ./sort random_data
relunsec@relunsec:~/software/coreutils/target/release$
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the reported hyperfine comparison between ./sort random_data and gnusort using a similarly sized random file. Then locate the sort implementation and profile the workload to identify the source of the slowdown. Done means the cause is addressed and the benchmark is rerun to verify the performance change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cli, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100