mktemp is slower than GNU 9.10
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
U - mktemp
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 24.1k
- Forks
- 2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 365
Description
$ hyperfine -N --warmup 20 hnu9.10/mktemp mktemp
Summary
gnu9.10/mktemp ran
3.37 ± 0.74 times faster than mktemp multi-call binary should not be used at bench.
Summary
/home/a/bin/gnu9.10/mktemp ran
1.52 ± 0.54 times faster than mktemp
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the reported hyperfine commands, ensuring the multi-call binary is excluded from the comparison as noted. Identify the mktemp implementation and measure it against the GNU binary; done means documenting or reducing the observed performance gap with a repeatable benchmark.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cli, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100