uttrflow / uttrflow/uttrflow-swift
Test AI suggestion path lookups at the root directory, and that a case-only difference is never corrected
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 17
- Avg merge
- 3h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 277
Description
## What happens
`Sources/UttrflowPredict/Verification.swift` decides what the machine can confirm about a path in a shell line. These have never run:
- line 165: `choices(for:)` when the word is exactly `/` (for example `cd /`);
- lines 231-232: `path(_:directoriesOnly:)` for an absolute path directly under root, such as `/et` (lookup under `/` with prefix `/`);
- line 222: `path` for a word without a slash;
- line 102: `nearestNeighbour(of:among:)` skipping a candidate that differs only in case, which the comment says is never a typo.
Measured on origin/main `26d7bc1` with `swift test --enable-code-coverage` (5,384 tests, all passing) and `xcrun llvm-cov export` over the test binary. The regions named below have an execution count of 0: no test runs them, so a change that breaks them passes `make verify`.
## Why it matters
If the root case is wrong, `cd /` offers entries of the current directory instead of `/`, and `cat /et` never completes to `/etc`. If the case-only guard goes, a directory named `Documents` "corrects" a typed `documents` on a case-insensitive disk.
## How to reproduce
Run `swift test --enable-code-coverage`, then `xcrun llvm-cov show -instr-profile .build/debug/codecov/default.profdata .build/debug/UttrflowPackageTests.xctest/Contents/MacOS/UttrflowPackageTests Sources/UttrflowPredict/Verification.swift` and look for the `0` counts on the lines named above.
## Acceptance criteria
- `Verification.choices(for: CompletionToken("cd /")!)` has one lookup of `.directories(under: "/")`.
- The lookup for `cat /et` is `Lookup("et", [.entries(under: "/")], prefix: "/")`.
- `nearestNeighbour(of: "readme", among: ["README"])` is `nil`.
- Each new test fails when the branch it covers is broken. Check this by hand before opening the PR: temporarily change the branch (flip the condition or return the other value), see the test fail, then restore it.
## Where to start
- `Tests/UttrflowPredictTests/VerificationTests.swift` (suite "What the machine can deny in a line the model wrote"). `LineShapeTests.swift` shows how `CompletionToken` values are built.
Read `CONTRIBUTING.md` first. Iterate with `swift test --filter `, then run `make verify` before pushing. Only tests change; no product code needs to.
**Size:** S.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Read CONTRIBUTING.md, then open Tests/UttrflowPredictTests/VerificationTests.swift and the "What the machine can deny in a line the model wrote" suite; use LineShapeTests.swift for CompletionToken construction. Add the four requested regression tests, verify each fails when its covered branch is temporarily broken, run the filtered suite, and finish with make verify.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- swift
- Domain
- cli, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 90/100