Discuss and capture modeller workflow enhancements
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 71
- Forks
- 27
- Avg merge
- 2d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Description
The Python conversion work affords many potential enhancements to modeller workflow. These need to be captured as stories following discussion with the modellers.
For example, building on the Jupyter notebook examples to encourage a common notebook-based workflow when running Process and sharing results. Or working at removing the individual CLIs for utilities and converting them to scriptable modules.
This links to https://git.ccfe.ac.uk/process/process/-/issues/1477.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked issue 1477 and the existing Jupyter notebook examples and utility CLIs mentioned in the issue. Discuss the workflow with modellers before defining scope. Done means capturing agreed workflow-enhancement stories, including any notebook-based workflow or scriptable-module work that is selected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook, python
- Domain
- cli, developer-experience, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100