typelevel / typelevel/scalacheck-effect
Support DSL for generating PropF.Result values
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Scala
- Stars
- 83
- Forks
- 26
- Avg merge
- 4h 49m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
ScalaCheck provides a small DSL for writing properties, consisting of syntax like:
- implication (
p1 ==> p2) - combining properties (
&&,||,==,all,atLeastOne) - labeling (
p :| "label")
Which of these should we support? All, none, some?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the existing PropF.Result entry point and comparing it with the ScalaCheck property DSL syntax listed in the issue. Determine which operators and helpers should be supported, then define completion as an agreed subset implemented with coverage for each supported form.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- scala
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100