typelevel / typelevel/sbt-typelevel
SPDX headers?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
core
question
- Dominant language
- Scala
- Stars
- 185
- Forks
- 62
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I have swallowed a bunch of defaults I don't like in the interest of comity, but https://github.com/typelevel/jawn/pull/402 has me wondering about whether this is our opportunity to wave the flag for SPDX. It accomplishes the same, is more terse, and is machine readable. SPDX is good.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the issue, the linked jawn pull request, and the referenced sbt-header SPDX documentation. No implementation file or test is named, so first establish the existing header configuration and agree on the intended SPDX behavior; done requires a documented scope and acceptance criteria before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- scala
- Domain
- build-system
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100