Could not find or construct Composite[com.SomeCaseClass] when adding any simple type to a case class with over 35 parameters.

I have a case class for mapping rows that contains 43 fields. When I remove the last few fields so the case class only has 35 the error below goes away. When I add a 36th field to the case class with the same simple type as the 35th (Int or Option[Int] for example) the following error surfaces.

Could not find or construct Composite[com.SomeCaseClass].
If com.SomeCaseClass is a simple type (or option thereof) that maps to a single column, you're probably missing a Meta instance. If com.SomeCaseClass is a product type (typically a case class, tuple, or HList) then probably one of its component types is missing a Composite instance. You can usually diagnose this by evaluating Composite[Foo] for each element Foo of the product type in question.

Do I need to create a custom mapping or Meta instance for case classes over 35 fields?

Start by reproducing the reported Composite derivation failure with a case class containing 35 fields, then add a 36th Int or Option[Int] field. Trace the Composite entry point mentioned in the report and determine whether the behavior is a bug or an arity limitation. Done means the larger case class maps successfully or the required custom mapping is clearly documented.