typelevel / typelevel/cats

diverging implicit expansion problem with nested

Open
#2,933 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Scala
Stars
5.5k
Forks
1.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

Here is a simplified version of a problem I am having. The following code:

implicit class fooOps[F[_], A](foo: F[Either[String, Option[A]]]) {
  import cats.instances.option._
  import cats.instances.either._
  import cats.syntax.nested._
  def bar(implicit functor: Functor[F]): F[Either[String, Option[String]]] =
    foo.nested.nested
      .map(_.toString)
      .value
      .value
}

gives me:

Error:(33, 18) diverging implicit expansion for type cats.Functor[F]
starting with value functor
foo.nested.nested

moving the refrence to Functor[F] to the class level, ie:

implicit class fooOps[F[_]: Functor, A](foo: F[Either[String, Option[A]]]) {
  def bar: F[Either[String, Option[String]]] = ???
}

gives me the same problem. Why is this? Is there any way around it?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No repository file or test entry point is named. Start by reproducing the nested implicit-expansion example with the shown cats imports and inspect the compiler's resolution of Functor[F]. Done means identifying why resolution diverges and documenting a confirmed explanation or workaround.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
scala
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.