typelevel / typelevel/cats

Diverging Inject instances

Open
#1,505 7 comments 4 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Scala
Stars
5.5k
Forks
1.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

Given this specific case when a type constructor being injected is the right-right part of Coproduct and defined in object.

trait Foo[A]
trait Bar[A]
object Baz {
  trait F[A]
}
object Repro {
  Inject[Baz.F, Coproduct[Foo, Coproduct[Bar, Baz.F, ?], ?]]
}

It does not compile and I get

Error:(12, 9) diverging implicit expansion for type cats.free.Inject[Baz.F,[γ$0$]cats.data.Coproduct[Foo,[γ$1$]cats.data.Coproduct[Bar,Baz.F,γ$1$],γ$0$]]
starting with method catsFreeReflexiveInjectInstance in class InjectInstances
  Inject[Baz.F, Coproduct[Foo, Coproduct[Bar, Baz.F, ?], ?]]

I compiles well if move F out of Baz. But sadly for my case it's not an option.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by running the Scala reproduction with Inject[Baz.F, Coproduct[Foo, Coproduct[Bar, Baz.F, ?], ?]] and inspect cats.free.Inject, Coproduct, and InjectInstances, especially catsFreeReflexiveInjectInstance. Done means the shown object-defined Baz.F case compiles without diverging implicit expansion while the existing Inject behavior remains intact.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
scala
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.