Supports multiple tunnels at the same time
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 15.2k
- Forks
- 2.4k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Sometimes I need to set up multiple tunnels, and I have to run multiple brook processes at the same time.
What I want is something like this:
brook relayoverbrook \
--link "brook://wssserver?password=PASS&wssserver=wss%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%3A443%2F" \
--from 127.0.0.1:3306 --to remote-db.example.com:3306 \
--from 127.0.0.1:6379 --to remote-redis.example.com:6379 \
--from 127.0.0.1:8080 --to remote-web.example.com:8080
or like this:
brook relayoverbrook \
--link "brook://wssserver?password=PASS&wssserver=wss%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%3A443%2F" \
--tunnel 127.0.0.1:3306,remote-db.example.com:3306 \
--tunnel 127.0.0.1:6379,remote-redis.example.com:6379 \
--tunnel 127.0.0.1:8080,remote-web.example.com:8080
Allowing multiple --from --to parameters to support multiple tunnels in a single process instance.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the relayoverbrook command and inspect how its --from and --to parameters are parsed and used. Compare the current single-tunnel behavior with the requested repeated parameters or --tunnel form. Done means one brook process can establish all three example tunnels concurrently without requiring separate processes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- cli, networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100