twisted.internet.endpoints._parseSSL and _parseClientSSL should not use OpenSSL APIs
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 6k
- Forks
- 1.2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
| @glyph reported | |
|---|---|
| Trac ID | trac#5268 |
| Type | enhancement |
| Created | 2011-09-21 05:29:38Z |
If #5267 ever gets implemented (and hopefully one day we support even more backends), we will need to make sure that all of our own code goes through those APIs so that OpenSSL is not required. _parseSSL uses DefaultOpenSSLContextFactory directly, and while _parseClientSSL uses ssl.[Private]Certificate.loadPEM, but then accesses the should-be-private 'original' attribute and feeds it to CertificateOptions which is kinda-sorta OpenSSL specific.
Searchable metadata
trac-id__5268 5268
type__enhancement enhancement
reporter__glyph glyph
priority__normal normal
milestone__
branch__
branch_author__
status__new new
resolution__None None
component__core core
keywords__
time__1316582978000000 1316582978000000
changetime__1317039075000000 1317039075000000
version__None None
owner__
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating twisted.internet.endpoints._parseSSL and _parseClientSSL and read issue #5267 to understand the proposed backend APIs. Trace their use of DefaultOpenSSLContextFactory, ssl.[Private]Certificate.loadPEM, and CertificateOptions. Done means both parsers use backend-neutral APIs without requiring direct OpenSSL access.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- networking, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100