A lot of built-in types are annotated in epytext as code and perhaps should be links
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
documentation
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 838
- Forks
- 123
- Avg merge
- 7h 58m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Description
A lot of built-in types are annotated in epytext as code (C{type}) and perhaps should be links (L{type}).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the repository's epytext documentation for built-in types annotated with C{type}. Determine which annotations should link to the corresponding types, then update the selected documentation references from code formatting to links and verify the affected documentation still builds correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100