tree-sitter / tree-sitter/java-tree-sitter
Why the behavior is different from python binding?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 141
- Forks
- 34
- Avg merge
- 14d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
there is alternation pattern:
([
(jsx_text) @i18n_issue
(jsx_attribute
(property_identifier) @attr_name
(#match? @attr_name "^(alt|placeholder|aria-label|title)$")
(string) @i18n_issue
)
])
It works in python binding, but (jsx_text) @i18n_issue is ignored in Java binding.
my Java code is:
try (var query = new Query(JsLanguage, source);
var cursor = new QueryCursor(query)) {
var items = cursor.findCaptures(tree.getRootNode()).toList();
// dump each item in items
// it proves "(jsx_text) @i18n_issue" never be used.
}
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Java code using Query, QueryCursor, and findCaptures, then reproduce the JSX query and compare its captures with the Python binding. The issue names no repository file or test; done means explaining or correcting why the jsx_text capture is omitted in Java and demonstrating the expected capture behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100