trailofbits / trailofbits/anchor-coverage
Feedback
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 15
- Forks
- 7
- Avg merge
- 10h 45m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
@procdump writes:
The accuracy of the results must be improved:
- `?` in Rust
- chained operations
- some executed lines are reported as uncovered or as to be hit erroneous number of times
- branching
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked comparison and the coverage results produced through anchor test, focusing on the listed Rust cases: ?, chained operations, executed lines, and branching. Done means the reported coverage and hit counts are accurate for each of those cases, with no reproduction or test locations provided in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- testing, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100