traceloop / traceloop/openllmetry
π Bug Report: Auto Instrumentation support for Watsonx
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7.4k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 8d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Which component is this bug for?
Watsonx Instrumentation
π Description
A follow up for https://github.com/traceloop/openllmetry/pull/662#issue-2199413692
π Reproduction steps
A follow up for https://github.com/traceloop/openllmetry/pull/662#issue-2199413692
π Expected behavior
auto instrumentation should works
π Actual Behavior with Screenshots
auto instrumentation should works
π€ Python Version
No response
π Provide any additional context for the Bug.
No response
π Have you spent some time to check if this bug has been raised before?
- I checked and didn't find similar issue
Are you willing to submit PR?
None
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up β it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing pull request #662, which this issue identifies as the follow-up context for Watsonx instrumentation. Trace the existing auto-instrumentation entry points and compare their behavior for Watsonx; the work is done when Watsonx auto instrumentation functions as expected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- ai, observability
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100