tpope / tpope/vim-obsession

Suggestion: Capture at least some options

Open
#8 8 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Vim Script
Stars
1.9k
Forks
73
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi Tim:

Don't capture options and maps. Options are sometimes mutilated and maps just interfere with updating plugins.

I agree about mappings, but I think It would be pretty useful to save path and tags, and even allow to pass them as options to :Obsession, that way every session could be more like an IDE project, but ala Vim. What do you think?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the :Obsession entry point and review how session files currently handle options and maps. The proposal mentions preserving path and tags and accepting them as :Obsession options; done would require an agreed scope and behavior for those values.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
vim
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.