top-think / top-think/think-orm

withJoin()驼峰bug

Open
#509 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
PHP
Stars
437
Forks
188
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

with() 关联进来的表字段会作为一个属性打包进来,
可是,withJoin在使用驼峰命名的时候 确是 合并到了主表, 而在不是驼峰命名的时候 又 变为 一个属性打包进来了

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the difference between with() and withJoin() when relation or field names use camelCase versus non-camelCase. Compare whether related fields are nested as an attribute or merged into the main record; done means the behavior is consistent with the intended relation-loading semantics.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
php
Domain
database
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.