top-think / top-think/think-orm
【field】和【withoutField】失效问题【暂时解决】
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- PHP
- Stars
- 437
- Forks
- 188
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
BaseQuery.php类内，public function field($field) 和 public function withoutField($field) 这两个方法，分别在各自的倒数第三行加一句unset($field[0]); 剔除 * 星号。
WTF！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
ps： 倒数第三行
if (isset($this->options['field'])) {
$field = array_merge((array) $this->options['field'], $field);
}
unset($field[0]);
$this->options['field'] = array_unique($field);
return $this;
另外:
1, if (true === $field) { 这个判断是干嘛的？都不会走进去。
2，getTableFields这个方法没有实现，干嘛的？干嘛的？
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in BaseQuery.php by reading field($field) and withoutField($field), including the reported unset($field[0]) location and the if (true === $field) branch. Inspect getTableFields as well, then reproduce the wildcard-field behavior and clarify the intended final behavior before deciding what completion means.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- php
- Domain
- database
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100