toaq / toaq/dictionary

database structure

Open
#44 37 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

database structure meta suggestion
Dominant language
Python
Stars
10
Forks
5
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

We should settle on what kind of fields we'd like in the database. CvGC had a bunch: synonyms and antonyms, examples, remarks… Shall we go with a similar set, or should we think about other fields to add?
— Regards, resident database technician

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Review the current dictionary data structure and compare it with the CvGC fields; done means agreeing on the database fields to support.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
databases
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.