add git-summary flag to consider commit sizes
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 18.1k
- Forks
- 1.2k
- Avg merge
- 5d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
awk it up, --size? i dont know
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by inspecting the git-summary command and its existing flags, then determine how the proposed --size option should use awk to account for commit sizes. The issue is complete when the intended size-aware summary behavior is defined and implemented, with its output verified against representative commits.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- awk, git, shell
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100