Reduced redundant operators
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 783
- Avg merge
- 4d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Description
Sometimes at the same time there are operators like A->B, B->C, A->C where one of A->B and B->C should be eliminated otherwise some redundant operators will be created.
For example, we have 3 stores with data size of (100G, 80G, 20G), the `balance-region-scheduler` will create 3 types of operators to transfer region: 100G->20G, 100G->80G, 80G->20G, the second one is redundant.
This can happen across multiple schedulers too.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by tracing the balance-region-scheduler and the paths that combine operators from multiple schedulers. Determine where transfer relationships such as A->B, B->C, and A->C are produced, then define tests showing that redundant transfers are not created while necessary operators remain.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100