For backoff, is is a good idea to use [backon](https://github.com/Xuanwo/backon/) instead?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 425
- Forks
- 163
- Avg merge
- 10h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
For backoff, is is a good idea to use [backon](https://github.com/Xuanwo/backon/) instead?
Originally posted by @Xuanwo in https://github.com/tikv/client-rust/pull/404#discussion_r1259224364
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the current backoff implementation and comparing its requirements with the backon library linked in the issue. Determine whether adopting backon fits the client, including any required dependency and usage changes; the issue is complete when that decision and its implementation scope are resolved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100