tidymodels / tidymodels/extratests
USe expect_named() more often
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
upkeep
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 3h 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
There are also many cases where the custom expect_ptype() would be useful
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by searching the repository for existing uses of expect_named() and the custom expect_ptype(). Review the surrounding tests to identify cases where these expectations apply; done means the relevant cases use the custom expectations consistently and the test suite still passes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100