Standalone Gateways
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- networking
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked issues in tf_operations and zos, especially #1889 and #1174, to understand the existing gateway and provider requirements. The issue does not name implementation files, tests, or a concrete completion condition; clarify the chosen architecture and scope before identifying the work needed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Gateways is a built in feature of ZOS which allows users to create public gateways from the public internet to the private workloads of the user over wireguard or yggdrasil.
Benefits of using zos gateway primitive:
- Integrated with the same ZOS api workload/deployment so no need to develop different APIs for it
- Integrated with the billing system, consumption are reported as part of user consumption report
- Most importantly, integration with the zos networking and user layout network, which allows the gateway to reach to the user private workloads.
If we have to build a standalone gateways that acts like this, it will need to re-implement huge parts of zos specially for the networking part. This is why i think the best course of action is to run entire zos node and limit it's support to only network+gateway workloads.
Gateways always also work as access points as well.
So from here we can tell we have only 2 paths:
- Use ZOS for standalone gateways, you get everything for free.
- Strip down the gateway with all supporting components, this is actually more work than it sounds to get everything right specially running the network workloads, and billing
- Make zos installable on any system with say apt ?!
The other path is to make zos usable on other service providers, this still require some work to be able to deal with provided hardware (specially the networking) but in total that's still less work than separating the gateway part.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 13
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from threefoldtech/grid_wiki
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
threefoldtech/grid_wiki#1602 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
threefoldtech/grid_wiki#1601 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
threefoldtech/grid_wiki#1600 ·
-
genexplorer Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
threefoldtech/grid_wiki#1599 ·
-
type_story
threefoldtech/grid_wiki#1598 · 3 comments · 2 assignees ·
All issues in threefoldtech/grid_wiki
Similar issues
-
kind/bug Ubuntu 24
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
kubernetes-sigs/kubespray#13532 ·
-
language/en needs-triage sig/network
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
kubernetes/website#57642 · 1 comment ·
-
app.loanspq.com OpenN: AdGuard DNS P3: Medium T: Incorrect Blocking
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters#242018 ·
-
[adam] AdamNet network read doesn't cap to MAX_ADAM_PACKET_LEN, overflows client receive buffers Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-firmware#1649 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
daeuniverse/dae#1116 · 1 comment ·