tensorflow / tensorflow/probability
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:25 AM Simeon Carstens ***@***.***> wrote: Looks like so far, there's still no negative binomial regression in TFP. I will give it a try then :-)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:25 AM Simeon Carstens @.***> wrote: Looks like so far, there's still no negative binomial regression in TFP. I will give it a try then :-)
Could you use this: https://www.tensorflow.org/probability/api_docs/python/tfp/glm/NegativeBinomial ?
…
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#631 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIVTNT7E3UT4SLIT5EGAI3R5W2A5ANCNFSM4JGXAITQ .
But I think is is for NB distribution, rather than NB regression, right?
Originally posted by @Jingyi-Qiu in https://github.com/tensorflow/probability/issues/631#issuecomment-1139493199
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the linked TFP NegativeBinomial API with the requested negative binomial regression, since the issue only identifies that distinction. Define the regression scope and completion criteria before locating the implementation and tests; the payload names no files or test entry points.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100