tensorflow / tensorflow/probability
ODE Solvers cannot compute gradients with respect to time
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I'm using tfp.math.ode.Solver and I would like to compute gradient with respect to time:
d/dt \int_0^t odefunc(T, x) dT = odefunc(t, x).
When odefunc is really simple and contains only constants, this works correctly:
def grad_time_work():
time = tf.constant(1.)
x_init = tf.constant(.4)
w = tf.constant(.5)
b = tf.constant(.2)
def odefunc(t, x):
return tf.nn.sigmoid(w * x + b)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
tape.watch(time)
res = tfp.math.ode.DormandPrince().solve(
odefunc, 0., x_init,
solution_times=[time],
)
x1 = res.states[0]
grad = tape.gradient(x1, time)
true_grad = odefunc(time, x1)
print("grad: ", grad.numpy())
print("true grad: ", true_grad.numpy())
grad_time_work()
However, when odefunc is an instance of tf.keras.Model, tf.Module, and so forth, gradients with respect to time get None:
def grad_time_error():
time = tf.constant(1.)
x_init = tf.constant(.4)
w = tf.Variable(.5) # changed only here
b = tf.Variable(.2) # tf.constant -> tf.Variable
def odefunc(t, x):
return tf.nn.sigmoid(w * x + b)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
tape.watch(time)
res = tfp.math.ode.DormandPrince().solve(
odefunc, 0., x_init,
solution_times=[time],
)
x1 = res.states[0]
grad = tape.gradient(x1, time)
true_grad = odefunc(time, x1)
print("grad: ", grad.numpy())
print("true: ", true_grad.numpy())
grad_time_error()
===>
AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-7-0bd74e9bac74> in <module>()
21 print("true: ", true_grad.numpy())
22
---> 23 grad_time_error()
<ipython-input-7-0bd74e9bac74> in grad_time_error()
18 grad = tape.gradient(x1, time)
19 true_grad = odefunc(time, x1)
---> 20 print("grad: ", grad.numpy())
21 print("true: ", true_grad.numpy())
22
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'numpy'
Google Colab to reproduce this issue here
Is this the desired behavior or are there any workarounds?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked Google Colab reproduction and trace tfp.math.ode.DormandPrince().solve when the odefunc closes over tf.Variable values. Compare the constant and variable cases, then verify that the intended gradient behavior or a documented workaround is covered by a focused reproduction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook, python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100