temporalio / temporalio/api

[Feature Request] Deprecate list workflow methods?

Open
#307 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

enhancement
Dominant language
Go
Stars
133
Forks
101
Avg merge
1d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
11

Description

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I heard we might want to deprecate some of these:

https://github.com/temporalio/api/blob/8f89bdc358642e1358876f164c7f4e663e225117/temporal/api/workflowservice/v1/service.proto#L356-L389

Users get surprised by the limitations of ListOpen/ListClosed (example).

Describe the solution you'd like

Mark deprecated these:

  • ListOpenWorkflowExecutions
  • ListClosedWorkflowExecutions

And keep these?

  • ListWorkflowExecutions
  • ListArchivedWorkflowExecutions (assuming you can't get archived workflows from ListWorkflowExecutions?)
  • ScanWorkflowExecutions (if it's important to have an unordered option?)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with temporal/api/workflowservice/v1/service.proto lines 356-389 and review the definitions for ListOpenWorkflowExecutions and ListClosedWorkflowExecutions alongside the other listed methods. Determine which methods should be deprecated and whether archived workflows remain covered by ListWorkflowExecutions; done means the deprecation scope and retained methods are clearly resolved in the API definition.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, grpc
Domain
api, backend-api-design
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
38/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.