Windows-only flake: backfill_stubs_preexisting_tables_on_reopen fails on table-name assertion
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
Research direction
Start with hyperdb-mcp/tests/table_catalog_tests.rs at the backfill_stubs_preexisting_tables_on_reopen test and its table-name assertion. Trace the catalog reopen path to determine why alpha is missing on the Windows CI leg, then verify the root cause and that the test passes reliably without simply rerunning the failed job.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
backfill_stubs_preexisting_tables_on_reopen failed on the test (windows-latest) leg during CI for #267, a PR whose diff touches only hyperdb-mcp/tests/daemon_tests.rs.
hyperdb-mcp\tests\table_catalog_tests.rs:429:5
assertion failed: names.contains(&"alpha".to_string())
test backfill_stubs_preexisting_tables_on_reopen ... FAILED
test result: FAILED. 21 passed; 1 failed
Why this is not #267
- #267 modifies one file,
daemon_tests.rs, and this failure is intable_catalog_tests.rs. - Both tests #267 modifies passed on that same Windows leg (
daemon_idle_timeout_shuts_down_daemon ... ok,daemon_heartbeat_prevents_idle_shutdown ... ok; that binary reported52 passed; 0 failed). - The assertion is about table names present after a catalog reopen and has no timing content.
Platform
Windows-only so far. The same test (windows-latest) leg passed on the v1.0.0-rc.2 release commit c9bacf2 (job 101457433522), so this is intermittent rather than a persistent break on that commit.
Please root-cause rather than re-run
Two cautions from recent experience in this area.
The failure record is perishable. Re-running a failed job rewrites the run conclusion, so the evidence of this failure disappears and historical flake counts become a lower bound. This was demonstrated live: an earlier run containing a real failure now reads success after a re-run.
Two "flakes" in this repo recently turned out to be real defects, not timing. slow_health_watchdog_reaps_hyperd_after_child_timeout was caused by validate_hyperd_process identifying the engine with ps -p <pid> -o comm=, which on Linux reads the main thread name — and hyperd renames its main thread to hyperdMain, so the guard rejected the very process it existed to reap (200/200 on Linux). And daemon_idle_timeout_shuts_down_daemon (#267) was a measurement-reference bug, where the test captured its Instant::now() after DaemonState::new() had already started the idle countdown. In both cases the obvious timing explanation was wrong.
So a backfill/reopen assertion failing on one platform is worth reading as a possible ordering or persistence bug in the catalog-reopen path before being written off as flaky.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 12h 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 60
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from tableau/hyper-api-rust
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#294 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#311 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#305 ·
-
Windows Named Pipe: verify DACL denies other users, and measure read-path perf for MCP workloads Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#302 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 72/100
tableau/hyper-api-rust#300 ·
All issues in tableau/hyper-api-rust
Similar issues
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
EricSpencer00/Resilient#4835 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bisq-network/bisq-musig#204 ·
-
agent:ready documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
cesarferreira/stax#890 ·