swiftlang / swiftlang/github-workflows
Add support for emitting github action annotations for soundness checks
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 115
- Forks
- 57
- Avg merge
- 1d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
It would be awesome if soundness checks emitted code-level annotations via workflow commands in PRs. Last I used them, it was as simple as echo-ing a special syntax to indicate file, line, and column information.
Namely, this could be useful for:
- header checks
- format/lint checks
- acceptable language checks
(It would be extra cool if this also worked for failing tests, but that might be a tad more involved).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the soundness checks for headers, format/lint, and acceptable-language checks, then review the linked GitHub Actions workflow-command syntax. Determine where each check reports file, line, and column information. Done means applicable failures emit GitHub annotations in pull requests; annotations for failing tests are explicitly treated as extra scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100