"streams" in Group
Open
Beginner friendly
Nobody has claimed this yet.
report
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Section 3.1 suggests that "streams" can be defined for Group actors. I think "streams" is too ambiguous to use effectively, and it's probably a better practice to use top-level properties instead.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating Section 3.1 in the repository's HTML specification. Review how "streams" is described for Group actors and update the section so the guidance is no longer ambiguous and clearly favors top-level properties where appropriate. Done means the recommendation is clear in the rendered specification.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100