swagger-api / swagger-api/swagger-codegen
[Swift] unable to handle response header and statusCode
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Mustache
- Stars
- 17.8k
- Forks
- 6k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Description
In swift template, generated source code only considered about response body as below, but we'd like to use not only body, but also header and statusCode in response.
open class func {{operationId}}({{#allParams}}{{paramName}}: {{#isEnum}}{{#isContainer}}{{{dataType}}}{{/isContainer}}{{^isContainer}}{{{datatypeWithEnum}}}_{{operationId}}{{/isContainer}}{{/isEnum}}{{^isEnum}}{{{dataType}}}{{/isEnum}}{{^required}}? = nil{{/required}}{{#hasMore}}, {{/hasMore}}{{/allParams}}{{#hasParams}}, {{/hasParams}}completion: @escaping ((_ {{#returnType}}data: {{{returnType}}}?,_ {{/returnType}}error: Error?) -> Void)) {
{{operationId}}WithRequestBuilder({{#allParams}}{{paramName}}: {{paramName}}{{#hasMore}}, {{/hasMore}}{{/allParams}}).execute { (response, error) -> Void in
completion({{#returnType}}response?.body, {{/returnType}}error);
}
}
This template will be generated as below.
open class func testClientModel(body: Client, completion: @escaping ((_ data: Client?,_ error: Error?) -> Void)) {
testClientModelWithRequestBuilder(body: body).execute { (response, error) -> Void in
completion(response?.body, error);
}
}
Swagger-codegen version
2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
Swagger declaration file content or url
Command line used for generation
Steps to reproduce
Related issues/PRs
Suggest a fix/enhancement
To keep codegen more generic, we should change mustache as below. (change response?.body to response )
open class func {{operationId}}({{#allParams}}{{paramName}}: {{#isEnum}}{{#isContainer}}{{{dataType}}}{{/isContainer}}{{^isContainer}}{{{datatypeWithEnum}}}_{{operationId}}{{/isContainer}}{{/isEnum}}{{^isEnum}}{{{dataType}}}{{/isEnum}}{{^required}}? = nil{{/required}}{{#hasMore}}, {{/hasMore}}{{/allParams}}{{#hasParams}}, {{/hasParams}}completion: @escaping ((_ {{#returnType}}data: Response<{{{returnType}}}>?,_ {{/returnType}}error: Error?) -> Void)) {
{{operationId}}WithRequestBuilder({{#allParams}}{{paramName}}: {{paramName}}{{#hasMore}}, {{/hasMore}}{{/allParams}}).execute { (response, error) -> Void in
completion({{#returnType}}response, {{/returnType}}error);
}
}
PromiseKit and RxSwift are also followed with above.
As follow my suggestion, the output will be as below.
open class func testClientModel(body: Client, completion: @escaping ((_ data: Response<Client>?,_ error: Error?) -> Void)) {
testClientModelWithRequestBuilder(body: body).execute { (response, error) -> Void in
completion(response, error);
}
}
//usage:
API.testClientModel(body: client)
.subscribe(onNext: { response in
print(response.body) // T? (generated as Model)
print(response.header) // [String : String]
print(response.statusCode)
}, onError: { error in
print(error.localizedDescription)
}).disposed(by: disposeBag)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Swift template that generates the completion callback and compare its current response?.body handling with the proposed Response<...> return. Check the corresponding PromiseKit and RxSwift output mentioned in the issue. Done means generated Swift clients expose the response body, headers, and status code rather than only the body.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- swift
- Domain
- api, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100