Could you use label "Good as First PR" a bit more ?

Open
#4,031 9 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
20/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are identified. Review the open issue list and existing "Good as First PR" labels first; the request is complete when suitable issues are consistently identified and labeled for newcomers, but the issue provides no implementation path.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

maintenance

Hi,
I'm would like to invest myself in this package. However due to the large number of issues it is difficult to know which issues I should take. I have noticed the "Good as First PR" Label but unfortunately there are only few and old issues.

So could you tag next issues that are not so difficult to fix in order that I try to do my first push request ?

I'm particularly interested to work on Time Series models.

Many thanks !

Malick

Dominant language
Python
Stars
11.6k
Forks
3.6k
Avg merge
7h 37m
Merged PRs (30d)
96

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from statsmodels/statsmodels

All issues in statsmodels/statsmodels

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.