consider adding open_progress to options
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 266
- Avg merge
- 2h 56m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
It would be nice be able to set open_progress globally inside options() instead that having to set it up in every call. While I can do formals(stan)$open_progress <- FALSE, I can't do it with sampling() for example that is called by brms.
See also https://github.com/paul-buerkner/brms/issues/796
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the existing options() and sampling() entry points, then compare how open_progress is currently passed in each call. Check the linked brms issue for the integration constraint. Done means a global open_progress setting works through sampling() without requiring callers to set it repeatedly, with behavior covered by the relevant tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100