Use a connected external integration without exposing credentials to the agent
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 152
- Forks
- 16
- Avg merge
- 14h 48m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 536
Description
Outcome
A user can ask a named agent to perform an allowed operation through a connected external integration. The agent receives the result but never a provider credential, refresh token, authorization code, client secret, private key, or reusable signed authority artifact.
Proposed approach
- Mecatl requests one registered, typed operation from a protected authority service.
- The authority service verifies the caller workload, the user/owner, the named agent, the exact resolved target, and current policy.
- It reads or refreshes a provider credential only after allowing that exact operation.
- It invokes the provider and returns a sanitized result.
- The first proof uses one concrete integration (for example, GitHub through ToolHive).
- The existing remote
mecabrokerworktrack is candidate implementation material (see #1562). Direct remote access versus a local Unix-socket sidecar client remains an open packaging decision.
Not in this issue
Scheduled/unattended operation, broker high availability, generic HTTP proxying, unrestricted provider support, and returning provider tokens to Mecatl.
Dependencies
#478 where verifiable Mecatl agent identity is required, and a selected ToolHive release/capability set for the first integration.
Delivery issues
- #1562 — Integrate the remote protected-operation broker on current main
- #1563 — Enforce user, agent, and exact-target authority for the first ToolHive integration
Proof
- A read-only agent can perform its allowed read but cannot obtain write authority.
- An unapproved agent causes neither credential read nor provider call.
- The protected authority service resolves one exact target before policy and credential lookup.
- No provider credential or reusable authority artifact appears in a model prompt, tool result, event, diagnostic, log, metric, or trace.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading delivery issues #1562 and #1563, then review dependency #478 and the selected ToolHive capability set. Use the Proof section as the acceptance criteria: verify exact-target authorization, blocked unauthorized operations, and that credentials or reusable authority artifacts never appear in prompts, results, or telemetry.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github, go
- Domain
- authentication, authorization, backend-api-design, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100