Tracking: agent-era repositioning — prioritized roadmap
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Prioritized outcome of the 2026-07 assessment of matlatl's heuristics against how agents actually build context (grep-first discovery, token budgets, the Open Knowledge Format, and the ETH Zurich context-file results). Full rationale lives in the linked issues.
Governing principle: validate before building. The ETH studies (arXiv:2602.11988, arXiv:2601.20404) showed generated context artifacts can hurt agent performance — matlatl's emitted artifacts are in that class, so evidence comes first, and new analytics wait for it.
Priority order
- #17 — P13: agent-outcome eval harness. Everything below is hypothesis until this exists.
- #18 — P14: OKF conformance mode. Time-sensitive positioning: the spec is weeks old and has no tooling; matlatl is a near-drop-in for the empty "OKF health gate" slot. Also reframes the structure heuristics from reader-UX (contested) to format integrity (uncontested).
- #19 — ADR 0016 scent-rationale correction. Docs-only, an afternoon; cheap credibility insurance.
- #20 — Hops-from-root metric. Cheapest high-value analytic; machinery (streaming APSP) already exists; the agent-correct replacement for raw in-degree discoverability.
- #24 — Rescoped 2026-07-19: linked code-path liveness already exists in core (verified: broken-link fires on a dead
[x](src/gone.go)). Only the backticked-prose-path scanner remains; demoted below #21/#22 and gated on #17 (new analytic, high FP risk). - #21 — Token cost as first-class data. Makes every emitted artifact budget-aware; integer-only, trivially deterministic.
- #22 — Title/heading quality findings. Where scent genuinely applies to agents (catalog titles, not anchors).
- #23 — Section self-containedness. Novel but highest false-positive risk; value contingent on
get-sectionusage — gate on #17's evidence. - #6 — P12 semantic frontier: deprioritized (see comment there) — in the fix-prompt loop the agent already is the semantic tier; revisit only with #17 link-recovery evidence.
Explicitly not planned
- Removing any existing heuristic — the Info-severity/non-gating design means weak-for-agents signals cost nothing; they stay, reframed as maintainer-lint for the LLM-wiki/OKF loop.
- New navigability scalars or centrality variants before #17 arbitrates the current ones.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the priority list and the linked issues, especially #17, #18, and the completed #19 and #20, to understand the proposed sequencing and existing evidence. This issue is a roadmap rather than a self-contained implementation task; it is done when the prioritized work is reflected in actionable issues with clear scope and dependencies.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- devtools, documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100