stacklok / stacklok/dockyard

🚨 Security: Critical or high vulnerabilities in mcp-neo4j-memory container

Open
#839 6 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

critical grype high security
Dominant language
Go
Stars
8
Forks
7
Avg merge
2d 5h
Merged PRs (30d)
62

Description

🚨 Security Scan Alert

A periodic security scan found fixable critical or high severity vulnerabilities in the container image. Findings at this level also block publishing in the build workflow.

  • Image: ghcr.io/stacklok/dockyard/uvx/mcp-neo4j-memory:0.4.5
  • Critical vulnerabilities: 1
  • High vulnerabilities: 1
Details

See the Security tab for full details.

Critical Vulnerabilities
  • GHSA-vv7q-7jx5-f767 in fastmcp@2.14.7: FastMCP OpenAPI Provider has an SSRF & Path Traversal Vulnerability
High Vulnerabilities
  • GHSA-rww4-4w9c-7733 in fastmcp@2.14.7: FastMCP: Missing Consent Verification in OAuth Proxy Callback Facilitates Confused Deputy Vulnerabilities

Automated security scan from periodic-security-scan workflow

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start in the Security tab for the findings on ghcr.io/stacklok/dockyard/uvx/mcp-neo4j-memory:0.4.5, then read the periodic-security-scan workflow to understand how the image is checked. Resolve the listed fastmcp vulnerabilities and confirm the scan passes so publishing is no longer blocked.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
docker, github-actions, python
Domain
devops, security
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
62/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.