stackabletech / stackabletech/superset-operator
Operator fails "silently" to update Superset Cluster's resource
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 35
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 12h 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Affected version
No response
Current and expected behavior
I could recreate the problem when changing the "data" storage size.Changing CPU or Memory resources seems to work (results in a Pod restart)
Possible solution
In order to capture this we either need webhooks or track the resources in the status of the custom resource and delete and recreate the statefulset (PVCs should be resized automatically?)
Additional context
No response
Environment
No response
Would you like to work on fixing this bug?
None
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Superset Cluster reconciliation and the handling of StatefulSets, PVCs, and resource changes. Reproduce a data-storage-size change, compare it with CPU or memory changes, and define done as ensuring the storage update is detected and applied without losing the PVC.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- kubernetes, rust
- Domain
- devops, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100